Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Healthcare Reform Bill. In Plain English, What Do You Think About It?

(my two cents will eventually appear in the comments.)

from The Examiner on Mar. 17, a few days before the Passage and signing of the "healthcare reform bill".

Here is a plain language summary of the major provisions of the health care reform bill.

Would I Be Forced to Purchase Insurance?

Probably not. If you already have employer-provided insurance you can keep it. If you do not currently have any insurance you may have to purchase a plan by 2014. Beginning in 2014 most Americans would have to purchase health care insurance or be forced to pay a fine. If someone already has insurance (including through their employer) they would not need to worry about this provision. For those who would be affected they could purchase insurance from anywhere but if they do not they would need to pay either $750 or 2% of their income, whichever is greater. Exemptions would be granted for those in financial hardship which is measured using the poverty line.

Would My Current Insurance Be Affected?

Yes and no. Yes in that any new plans would be regulated by the federal government. The regulation would make plans provide a minimum of amount of benefits but not a maximum. It would also implement consumer protections and an appeals process for consumers who want to dispute the decisions of their insurance companies on individual coverage. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that premiums would go down under reform compared to the rate premiums would go up without reform.

Having said all that the reform plan "grandfathers" plans already in existence. Therefore a plan currently in existence would be exempt to any changes at least for a while under the current bill.

What About This Exchange Idea and the Public Option?

There is no public option or new government provided insurance plan under the current bill. Instead each state would have a health care insurance exchange where any individual can purchase health insurance. The insurance plans in the exchange would have to meet federal regulation that would ensure they provide minimum benefits, etc. Individuals who are currently covered by an employer-provided plan could not purchase form the exchange. Undocumented immigrants could also not purchase from the plan.

All plans in the exchange would be regulated by the federal government. These regulations would include requirements that the plans provide a certain minimum level of coverage, that they do not discriminate based on pre-existing exclusions, that they spend a high percentage of their premiums on actual care (around 80%), and that they follow certain consumer protection laws. In addition plans could no longer limit how much costs they are willing to cover. In the past insurance companies would be able to limit their liability to $250,000 for example and stop paying once that limit was reached.

What Would Happen to Medicare?

The proposal would set up a board that would research and propose solution to reduce the costs of Medicare. The board would be specifically prohibited from proposing anything which would amount to rationing care for the elderly. Instead the proposal would focus on reducing waste and fraud while making Medicare more efficient.

What if I Can Not Afford Health Insurance?

Individuals who make between 100%-400% above the federal poverty level would be eligible to receive credits to assist them in purchasing health care insurance. The amount of credit would generally go down the more income an individual made. For the poorest the credit may pay for all of their health care premiums.

Would Employers Be Forced to Provide Insurance?

Maybe. If a business has over 50 full-time employees they will be forced to offer health care coverage or face a $750 fee per employee. Businesses with less than 50 employees would be exempted from providing coverage.

What About Medicaid?

Medicaid would be expanded to cover all individuals under the age of 65 who make less than 133% of the federal poverty level. Currently the poverty level is around $18,000 for a family of three.

Does the Bill Pay for Abortions?

The bill keeps the current federal law on abortion funding in that federal funds could not be used directly to pay for abortion or abortion-related services. The current bill does not include the abortion language in the House bill which put restriction on funding which were even more strict than the current law. Essentially the House bill would have prevented individual receiving federal assistance from purchasing any health care plan (private or not) that provided abortion coverage.

What About Small Businesses?

Initially small businesses would receive a tax credit for up to 35% of the money they pay to purchase health insurance for their employees. By 2014 that percentage would increase to 50%. The idea is to help small businesses pay for health insurance coverage since they currently do not have the bargaining power of larger businesses.

Small businesses would be allowed to join forces in order to purchase insurance for their employees. In other words five small businesses could all negotiate with an insurance company together in order to get a lower rate as big businesses currently do.

How is It All Paid For?

First there is a cadillac plan tax. If an insurance plan costs $8,500 for an individual or $23,000 for family it would be taxed at 40% for any amount above those amounts. Most health care plans cost much less than those amounts in premiums.

Secondly there are taxes on health insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, and medical supply companies. Each of these companies would be assessed fees. Pharmaceuticals would pay $2 billion, medical supply companies would pay $2.3 billion, and health insurance companies would pay $2 billion starting in 2011 and increasing to $10 billion by 2017.

Finally the bill would count on increased efficiency and reduced waste in Medicare to offset some of the other costs. Overall the bill was projected to save a little over $100 billion in the first ten years of its existence and well over $700 billion after that. Those projections were done by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Criminal Injustice System At It Again - Do You Know About The Scott Sisters?

    For Immediate Release
    Afrosphere Action Coalition - March 18, 2010
    Contact: Marpessa Kupendua The of Committee to Free the Scott Sisters at
    nattyreb@gmail.com

    Wrongly Convicted In Dire Health Situation
    DAY OF BLOGGING FOR THE SCOTT SISTERS

    Jamie Scott, who was convicted with her sister Gladys Scott and given
    double-life sentences each for an $11.00 robbery of which there was no
    credible evidence presented at trial; is now in a dire medical situation in
    Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, and may lose her life before
    being able to prove her innocence without proper medical treatment.

    Jamie has diabetes and receives regularly dialysis in the prison due to
    failed kidneys. An infection developed in her catheter causing her greater
    illness. According to Marpessa Kupendua Jamie and Gladys' mother Mrs. Eveyln
    Rasco received word on March 11, "that Jamie's temporary catheter has been
    moved to her chest and is plugged up with green fluid and pus. Her hands,
    legs and feet are swollen and she is in tremendous pain. She is very, very
    weak. This is at least her fourth catheter infection and this one is
    extremely bad, Jamie is doing very poorly. The prison is aware of Jamie's
    current condition yet Jamie remains in the prison infirmary."

    Mrs. Rasco and Afrosphere Bloggers are calling on the public to request that
    elected and prison officials in Mississippi immediately move Jamie to
    qualified medical facilities where she can receive proper medical care
    forthwith. We also ask that the media do investigative inquiry about this
    tragic situation.

    CONTACT GOV. BARBOUR'S OFFICE
    P.O. Box 139
    Jackson, Mississippi 39205
    1-877-405-0733 or 601-359-3150
    Fax: 601-359-3741
    (If you reach VM leave msgs, faxes, and please send letters)

    CONTACT CHRISTOPHER EPPS
    Christopher Epps, Commissioner of Prisons for the State of Mississippi
    601-359-5600 CEPPS@mdoc.state.ms.us 723 North President Street Jackson, MS
    39202

    Congressman Bennie Thompson
    3607 Medgar Evers Blvd.
    Jackson, MS 39213
    601-946-9003(ph)
    601-982-5337 (fx)
    Benniethompson@mail.house.gov

    Congressman John Conyers
    2426 Rayburn H.O.B.
    Washington, DC 20515
    Ph: 202-225-5126
    Fax: 202-225-0072

    On 12/24/93, the Scott County Sheriff's Department arrested Jamie and
    Gladys Scott for armed robbery even though three young males, ranging from
    ages 14 to 18, confessed to committing the crime and the women have
    unwaveringly maintained their complete innocence. Despite this, the corrupt
    Mississippi sheriff used coercion, threats, and harassment to compel the
    young men to turn state's evidence against the Scott Sisters due to a
    long-standing vendetta against a family member. In 10/94 the Scott Sisters
    were sentenced to extraordinary double-life terms each, despite the facts
    that no one was harmed, neither sister had prior convictions, no weapon was
    ever recovered, and the amount alleged to have been taken was approximately
    $11.00. Even if they were guilty as charged, this sentence is completely
    outrageous and cruel.

    The Scott Sisters are now in their 15th year of incarceration and their five
    children and grandchildren are being raised by their now ailing mother. The
    defendants and their family are wholly dependent on support from the press,
    organizations, and all those dedicated to justice in making this debacle as
    public as possible.

    Their Story has had some success in getting media of late, the most notable
    being a very brief mention on HLN's "Issues with Jane Velez- Mitchell", a
    clip of which is available to view here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yO_p3tbjy5E